Blues vs. Blackhawks: Redemption or Regression?

St. Louis Blues · 2026-09-25 · Beatline Sports Podcast Network

Amanda: One goal. That’s all it took to settle the immediate narrative, but in the NHL, one game is never just one game. We are back on the Beatline Podcast Network, and if you think the St. Louis Blues have figured out their identity after that gritty 1-0 win over Chicago last night, you might be looking at the wrong mirror.

Paul: It was a defensive showcase, Amanda. Calle Rosen got the lone marker, Pavel Buchnevich had the assist, but let’s not pretend this was a offensive masterclass. The Blues are sitting at 1-2-0 right now, sixth in the Central Division, and they’re about to play the same team again tomorrow. Same opponent, different result? Or just a fluke?

Amanda: Exactly. So here is what we are breaking down today. First, we look at the matchup angles for tonight’s tilt against the Blackhawks—why does repeating a series matter so much this early? Second, we dive into the injury report, specifically looking at who is actually suited up for St. Louis given the absences of Tyler Tucker, Jordan Greenway, and Connor Bedard. And third, we’ll give you our keys to victory and a bold prediction for where this game goes.

Paul: We’ve talked about neutral-zone discipline before. Remember yesterday? We said Robert Thomas needed to dominate face-offs. He did. But can he do it twice in two days against the same squad? Let’s get into it.

Amanda: Let’s start with the elephant in the room: playing Chicago twice in two days. It feels like a trap, doesn't it? You win by a single score, you feel good, but then you have to turn around and do it again. What is your read on the psychological edge here?

Paul: Psychologically, it’s messy. Last night, the Blues held Chicago to zero goals. That’s a statement. But tactically, Chicago knows exactly what St. Louis is doing now. They saw the forecheck, they saw the zone entries. If the Blues rely on the same structure without adjustment, Chicago will exploit the gaps. The key isn’t just winning; it’s adapting.

Amanda: So you’re saying the element of surprise is gone? Because last night, Calle Rosen scoring was a bit of a shocker. He wasn’t expecting that kind of traffic in the slot.

Paul: Rosen got lucky, sure. But more importantly, the defensive structure held. The issue is, Chicago has had twenty-four hours to study that structure. Now they know where the passing lanes are. The Blues need to change up their neutral-zone pressure. If they stay static, they’ll get burned.

Amanda: Static. That’s a scary word for a team trying to climb out of sixth place in the Central. But Paul, look at the roster list. There are some fresh faces here. Maddox Dagenais, Zach Dean, Antoine Dorion. Are these guys going to make the difference, or is it still the veterans carrying the load?

Paul: It’s the veterans. Specifically, Pius Suter and Oskar Sundqvist. They provide the stability that the younger centers like Dagenais and Dean aren’t ready for yet. The Blues can’t afford to roll four lines of rookies against a hungry Chicago team. They need experience in the corners.

Amanda: Okay, so experience wins the day. But let’s talk about the injuries. This is huge. Tyler Tucker is out. Jordan Greenway is out. And interestingly, Connor Bedard is listed as out too—which, wait, Bedard is a Blackhawk, right? How does that affect us?

Paul: Right, Bedard is Chicago. His absence is massive for them. Without Bedard, Chicago loses their primary playmaker and their most dangerous skater. That changes the entire matchup angle. St. Louis doesn’t have to worry about the number one line as much. It opens up space for Dylan Holloway and Pavel Buchnevich.

Amanda: That is a gift! So, we lose Greenway and Tucker, but we gain a tactical advantage because Chicago is missing their best player. Does that swing the prediction?

Paul: It swings it heavily. But don’t forget, losing Greenway means losing physicality. Losing Tucker means losing depth defense. St. Louis needs to be smarter, not harder. If they try to out-brawl Chicago without Greenway, they’ll lose. They have to out-skate them.

Amanda: Out-skate, out-smart. I like that. Before we move on to the specific line combinations and our final predictions, I want to take a quick breath. This show is free, with no ads and no paywall. Listener support is what protects that. Please chip in via the link in the episode description.

Amanda: Welcome back. Let’s get tactical. We know Robert Thomas is the engine. Yesterday we predicted he would lead in face-offs. Did he deliver? And more importantly, how does his performance impact the power play units tonight?

Paul: He delivered. Robert Thomas won nearly sixty percent of his draws last night. That’s crucial. Every time he wins a draw in the defensive zone, it kills Chicago’s momentum. Tonight, if he keeps that up, the Blues’ penalty kill stays structured. It’s all connected.

Amanda: And what about the top line? Calle Rosen with the goal, Buchnevich with the assist. Is that line clicking, or was it a one-off moment?

Paul: Buchnevich is finding rhythm. He’s been quiet in the preseason, but last night, he looked sharp. He’s reading the ice better. If he can replicate that vision tonight, especially with Bedard out, the seams will be wide open for him. He’s the guy to watch.

Amanda: Okay, so Buchnevich is the X-factor. But what about the defense? Philip Broberg is on the blueline. With Tucker out, does Broberg see more ice? Is he ready for the increased workload?

Paul: Broberg is young. He’s talented, but he’s prone to mistakes in transition. Without Tucker’s defensive reliability, St. Louis needs Broberg to be conservative. Don’t force the breakout pass. Keep it simple. If he tries to be a hero, Chicago will punish him.

Amanda: Conservative play from Broberg. That sounds like a change for him. And what about the bottom six? Who steps up when Greenway is sidelined? Ross Johnston? Dylan Holloway?

Paul: Holloway. He brings energy. Johnston is an enforcer type, which is nice, but Holloway can play forward. He’ll likely be paired with someone like Jonatan Berggren or Justin Carbonneau. That line needs to generate hits and keep the puck deep.

Amanda: Deep pucks and heavy hits. Okay, I’m hearing you. No pretty plays, just hard hockey. But Paul, we have to talk about the goaltending. Who is in net? The brief doesn’t specify, but with a 1-0 win last night, confidence should be high.

Paul: Confidence is good, but consistency is better. The goalie needs to handle the rebound battle. Chicago, even without Bedard, has other shooters. If the Blues leak rebounds, they’ll concede. It’s not about the save; it’s about the second-chance defense.

Amanda: Rebound control. Simple, but critical. Alright, we’ve covered the players, the injuries, the matchups. Let’s wrap this up with our keys to the game and that bold prediction. What does it take for St. Louis to win tomorrow night?

Paul: Three keys. One: Face-off dominance from Robert Thomas. Two: Conservative defense from Philip Broberg. Three: Physicality from the bottom six to compensate for Greenway’s absence. If they hit those three marks, they win.

Amanda: I agree on all three. But here is my bold prediction. I think the Blues win, but it’s ugly. I’m not seeing a blowout. I’m seeing another low-scoring affair. Maybe 2-1? Or even 1-0 again?

Paul: I’m going slightly higher. I think Buchnevich finds the back of the net again. And maybe a secondary scorer chips in. I’ll go 3-1. The Blues adjust, Chicago panics without Bedard, and St. Louis capitalizes on the extra space.

Amanda: 3-1. Bold. I’ll stick with my 2-1 grind-it-out win. But either way, the Blues are taking points. They need to build on that 1-2-0 record. Can they climb out of sixth place in the Central?

Paul: They can. But only if they stop relying on luck. Rosen’s goal was great, but it wasn’t sustainable. They need to create their own chances. That’s the real story here.

Amanda: Well, there you have it. A defensive struggle, a tactical shift, and a chance for redemption against the Blackhawks. Whether it’s 1-0 or 3-1, the Blues are fighting for every inch. Thanks for listening to the Beatline Podcast Network.

Paul: Make sure to subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen. Share this episode with a fellow Blues fan who needs to hear this analysis. See you tomorrow.

Amanda: Go Blues!